Kaleidoscope home
helploginprintemail   log in  
  Search  

Research programme

Part of: Vision
CreatedDiana Laurillard, 06 September, 2006 Modified:17 October, 2006
SummaryThis section will propose a future research programme for TEL - in all its diversity - building on the previous sections [2pp]
< 6.3 our advice to FP7

This is the draft text of the main messages for this Section, developed from the comments made in the first round of consultation.

Please EITHER: copy and paste this text into the message box below, and edit it to an improved version of the statements you think this section should be making, OR: draft your own statements. Insert a title and post the message. Also, please respond to requests for examples – these will help to bring the document to life.


Our research programme will be built from the analysis in the preceding sections. Currently the candidates for research questions the programme should address are as follows:

- How can the substance of learning be transformed by the design of adaptive systems that take account of the social and cultural embedding of learners?

- How might digital technologies afford pluralistic possibilities in epistemology  (what might be learned and how) and equity (by whom can it be learned and when?)

- In what ways can digital technologies be deployed to foster more open and accessible routes for learners throughout the life course?

- Can we design methodologies for exploring the possibilities of more productive learning, which is more successful and efficient in achieving its intended outcomes? 

- What are the social and cultural opportunities and constraints for the embedding of digital technologies in learning and teaching?

- How can technology be used to support every learner achieving their learning potential?

- How does TEL support the role of teaching, by the teacher, and by peers?

- How does technology support the process of 'negotiation of meaning’ in the context of learning?


What do you think of these questions? What we end up with here should help us define, in the final version, a visionary research programme, and its size and shape. 

Show Previous Versions




discuss Chapter 7: Research programme

view dump

Title (responses)AuthorDateLast Post
 Notes from the Convergence Workshop (0)
Allison Walker 12/08/06 - 15:15 12/08/06 - 15:15
 Sustainability (0)
Tim Neumann 12/03/06 - 17:00 12/03/06 - 17:00
 Away from technology as the focus in research (0)
Tim Neumann 12/03/06 - 16:52 12/03/06 - 16:52
 How does TEL support the role of teaching, by the teacher, and by peers? (0)
Claudio Dondi 11/24/06 - 12:50 11/24/06 - 12:50
 Two topics (0)
Paul A. Kirschner 11/06/06 - 08:59 11/06/06 - 08:59
 --- Version 3 published --- (0)
Diana Laurillard 11/03/06 - 17:02 11/03/06 - 17:02
 --- Version 2 pubished --- (0)
Yishay Mor 10/11/06 - 13:48 10/11/06 - 13:48
 Making the change happen? We, the teachers. (1)
Denis Bouhineau 10/09/06 - 14:00 10/09/06 - 14:16
 again, 'hows' without 'whats' or 'whys' (2)
Yishay Mor 10/01/06 - 03:57 10/05/06 - 10:54
 learning and teaching (0)
Vincent Jonker 10/01/06 - 08:29 10/01/06 - 08:29
 affordances include constraints (0)
Yishay Mor 10/01/06 - 04:00 10/01/06 - 04:00
 Research questions (0)
Kevin Walker 09/27/06 - 22:50 09/27/06 - 22:50

Author:
Allison Walker
Date:
12/08/2006 - 15:15
Title:
Notes from the Convergence Workshop

Following are some notes taken during Diana's presentation at the Convergence Workshop:

Sally Barnes: outcomes of some Kal sustainaibility discussions.

Mike Sharples: visionary programme. need some european grand challenges. Some exist in UK and other places. We are in the best place to determine what they are; they we can lobby our own countries, and then have them put on the agenda. He's inovlved in one lifelong learning. Relate these back to themes that we're involved in. We are being too reactive, perhaps, with FP7. This way we can set the European agenda.

DL: set 2 or 3 additional grand challenges and have people vote.

Barbara Wasson: Bologna Process and impact for mobility and higher learning.